The Use of Epidemiology in Personal Injury Cases (Florida)

epidemiology.jpgEpidemiology is the study of patterns of health and illness and associated factors at the population level. Forensic (applying science to answer questions of interest to a legal system) epidemiology can be useful in personal injuries cases to prove causation of an injury.

The personal injury claimant has the burden of proving that his/her injuries or conditions were more likely than not caused by an accident or offending agent (e.g., smoking). This burden becomes more difficult when the complained of injuries and conditions can occur naturally without a known precipitating cause. Examples include herniated intervertrebral discs and lung cancer.

Various types of experts, including doctors and biomechanists, are used on both sides to present evidence regarding the issue of causation. The expertise of forensic epidemiologists is greatly underutilized.

Epidemiologists use “relative risk” to compare the chance of injuries and conditions being caused in certain ways. Two examples: (1) The risk of an intervertebral disc injury from a crash is 1 in 200, while the risk of an individual developing the symptoms at the same point in time if the crash hadn’t occurred is usually less than 1 in 100,000. (2) The chance that a person who smokes will get lung cancer is 20% compared to 1% for non-smokers.

A common defense tactic in civil justice cases is to propose alternative explanations for the injuries/conditions besides the targeted accident or exposure. The defendant’s hope is that a jury will attribute the damage to something other than the accident or exposure. The epidemiologist can be an important expert to counter the shifting-blame defense.

Defendants try to misuse epidemiologic concepts of risk to deny plaintiffs compensation for injury by bringing experts to assert that the “absolute risk” of injury indicates an injury was unlikely. Instead of comparing the chances between alternative explanations, the defense expert simply points to the odds of being injured in the way claimed by the plaintiff. The defense will argue that the odds of sustaining a disc injury in a crash (1 in 200) are extremely low. Standing alone, the number seems to favor the defendant. However, when compared to the odds of suffering the same injury without a crash (less than 1 in 100,000), the point of view changes dramatically.

Legal cases are mostly about evidence. The side with the strongest, most persuasive evidence should and usually does prevail. When much of a case concerns the likelihood of something occurring, the forensic epidemiologist can be an important tool in making the difference between winning and losing.

Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. is a South Florida based law firm committed to the judicial system and to representing and obtaining justice for individuals – the poor, the injured, the forgotten, the voiceless, the defenseless and the damned, and to protecting the rights of such people from corporate and government oppression. We do not represent government, corporations or large business interests.

Contact us today to arrange a free, confidential consultation to discuss your important legal matter.